Ryzen 7 7730U vs Core i9-12950HX
Aggregate performance score
i9-12950HX outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 240 | 602 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-HX | Barcelo-U Refresh |
| Release date | 10 May 2022 (2 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1.4 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 14 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 215 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1964 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i9-12950HX outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i9-12950HX outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 74% in Passmark.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i9-12950HX outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 70% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i9-12950HX outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 19% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 20.96 | 12.05 |
| Integrated graphics card | 6.15 | 9.11 |
| Recency | 10 May 2022 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
i9-12950HX has a 73.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Ryzen 7 7730U, on the other hand, has 48.1% faster integrated GPU, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i9-12950HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7730U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12950HX and Ryzen 7 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
