3015Ce vs i9-12900KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-12900KF
2021
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
26.93
+1866%

Core i9-12900KF outperforms 3015Ce by a whopping 1866% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1812224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.93no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameAlder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date27 October 2021 (2 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$564no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 4.0no data
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache768 KB192 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB4 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size215.25 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FT5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.805 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12900KF 26.93
+1866%
3015Ce 1.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-12900KF 41131
+1860%
3015Ce 2099

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.93 1.37
Recency 27 October 2021 4 August 2020
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 24 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 6 Watt

i9-12900KF has a 1865.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 700% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

3015Ce, on the other hand, has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015Ce in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-12900KF is a desktop processor while 3015Ce is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900KF and 3015Ce, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12900KF
Core i9-12900KF
AMD 3015Ce
3015Ce

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 515 votes

Rate Core i9-12900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate 3015Ce on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12900KF or 3015Ce, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.