Ultra 7 164U vs i9-12900K

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-12900K
2021
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
26.11
+175%
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
9.51

Core i9-12900K outperforms Core Ultra 7 164U by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking185797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.57no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency19.77100.00
Architecture codenameAlder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release date27 October 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$448

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2414
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 4.0no data
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache768 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size215.25 mm2"no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.805 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz1.8 GHz
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes208
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12900K 26.11
+175%
Ultra 7 164U 9.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-12900K 41470
+175%
Ultra 7 164U 15106

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-12900K 4057
+211%
Ultra 7 164U 1304

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-12900K 289
+28.4%
Ultra 7 164U 225

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-12900K 17776
+137%
Ultra 7 164U 7503

Blender(-)

i9-12900K 125
Ultra 7 164U 395
+217%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-12900K 2006
+31.8%
Ultra 7 164U 1522

7-Zip Single

i9-12900K 6576
+42.4%
Ultra 7 164U 4619

7-Zip

i9-12900K 97316
+231%
Ultra 7 164U 29361

WebXPRT 3

i9-12900K 325
+37.7%
Ultra 7 164U 236

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.11 9.51
Recency 27 October 2021 14 December 2023
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 24 14
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 9 Watt

i9-12900K has a 174.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.

Ultra 7 164U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1288.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 164U in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-12900K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 164U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900K and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12900K
Core i9-12900K
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1603 votes

Rate Core i9-12900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12900K or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.