Ryzen 5 8400F vs Core i9-12900HX
Aggregate performance score
i9-12900HX outperforms Ryzen 5 8400F by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 217 | 406 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 71.93 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-HX | Phoenix |
| Release date | 10 May 2022 (2 years ago) | 1 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | no data | $169 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1.4 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 14 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 215 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1964 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i9-12900HX outperforms Ryzen 5 8400F by 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i9-12900HX outperforms Ryzen 5 8400F by 41% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.06 | 15.70 |
| Recency | 10 May 2022 | 1 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
i9-12900HX has a 40.5% higher aggregate performance score, 166.7% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 18.2% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i9-12900HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 8400F in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i9-12900HX is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 8400F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900HX and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
