Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs i9-12900H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-12900H
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
17.53
+33.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.13

Core i9-12900H outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking359575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PRembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency36.6744.15
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-H (2022)Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)20 April 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm6 nm
Die size217 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1744FP7
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligibleAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHzno data
Execution Units96no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12900H 17.53
+33.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 13.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-12900H 27851
+33.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 20863

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-12900H 8235
+32%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6238

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-12900H 47767
+29.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 36959

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i9-12900H 4.03
+96%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7.9

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-12900H 25
+9.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 23

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-12900H 2577
+29.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1992

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-12900H 266
+14.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 233

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-12900H 2.99
+4.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 2.87

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-12900H 10.3
+33.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7.7

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-12900H 12237
+40.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 8734

Blender(-)

i9-12900H 206
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 274
+33.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-12900H 1820
+25.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1452

7-Zip Single

i9-12900H 5881
+11.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 5289

7-Zip

i9-12900H 64909
+23.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 52568

WebXPRT 3

i9-12900H 296
+9.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 270

CrossMark Overall

i9-12900H 1872
+24.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1505

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i9-12900H 264
+23.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 214

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i9-12900H 376
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 483
+28.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.53 13.13
Recency 4 January 2022 20 April 2022
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

i9-12900H has a 33.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12900H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12900H
Core i9-12900H
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 627 votes

Rate Core i9-12900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12900H or Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.