Xeon E5-2696 V3 vs Core i9-12900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i9-12900
2022
16 cores / 24 threads
22.20
+54.1%

Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking208455
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation50.6945.95
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Haswell-EP (2014)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)8 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$489no data
Current price$395 (0.8x MSRP)$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-12900 has 10% better value for money than Xeon E5-2696 V3.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads2436
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)45 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm22 nm
Die size215 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C77 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA17002011-3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR3, DDR42133 MHz Quad-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-12900 22.20
+54.1%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 14.41

Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 54% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-12900 34341
+54%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 22296

Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 54% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-12900 2472
+121%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 1118

Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 121% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-12900 13106
+60.2%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 8182

Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 60% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.20 14.41
Recency 4 January 2022 8 September 2014
Physical cores 16 18
Threads 24 36
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 145 Watt

The Core i9-12900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2696 V3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-12900 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2696 V3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-12900 and Xeon E5-2696 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-12900
Core i9-12900
Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 168 votes

Rate Core i9-12900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 1084 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-12900 or Xeon E5-2696 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.