i7-13650HX vs i9-11900KB

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-11900KB
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.70
Core i7-13650HX
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 55 Watt
20.13
+36.9%

Core i7-13650HX outperforms Core i9-11900KB by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking496284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.86no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Raptor Lake-HX
Power efficiency21.0133.99
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
Release dateMay 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$539$485

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFinIntel 7 nm
Die size190 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1787FCBGA1964
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel® UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHz1.55 GHz
Execution Units3216

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-11900KB 14.70
i7-13650HX 20.13
+36.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-11900KB 22917
i7-13650HX 31378
+36.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-11900KB 9538
i7-13650HX 10616
+11.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-11900KB 50665
i7-13650HX 68755
+35.7%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-11900KB 14961
i7-13650HX 16051
+7.3%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-11900KB 22
i7-13650HX 37
+69.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-11900KB 2027
i7-13650HX 3076
+51.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-11900KB 247
i7-13650HX 271
+9.7%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-11900KB 2.84
i7-13650HX 3.31
+16.5%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-11900KB 11.6
i7-13650HX 16.7
+44%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i9-11900KB 106
i7-13650HX 175
+65.2%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i9-11900KB 273
i7-13650HX 346
+26.9%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-11900KB 9584
+13.8%
i7-13650HX 8422

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-11900KB 8924
i7-13650HX 13730
+53.8%

Blender(-)

i9-11900KB 263
+59.2%
i7-13650HX 165

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-11900KB 1656
i7-13650HX 1845
+11.4%

7-Zip Single

i9-11900KB 5979
+1.5%
i7-13650HX 5891

7-Zip

i9-11900KB 50152
i7-13650HX 77020
+53.6%

WebXPRT 3

i9-11900KB 269
i7-13650HX 302
+12.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.70 20.13
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

i7-13650HX has a 36.9% higher aggregate performance score, 75% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-13650HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-11900KB in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-11900KB is a desktop processor while Core i7-13650HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-11900KB and Core i7-13650HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-11900KB
Core i9-11900KB
Intel Core i7-13650HX
Core i7-13650HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 63 votes

Rate Core i9-11900KB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 648 votes

Rate Core i7-13650HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-11900KB or Core i7-13650HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.