EPYC 9534 vs Core i9-11900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-11900F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.55
EPYC 9534
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.36
+294%

EPYC 9534 outperforms i9-11900F by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking46719
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.716.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameRocket Lake (2021)Genoa
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,803
Current price$229 $4700 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-11900F has 575% better value for money than EPYC 9534.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.45 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)4 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)64 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-11900F 14.55
EPYC 9534 57.36
+294%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Core i9-11900F by 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-11900F 22512
EPYC 9534 88716
+294%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Core i9-11900F by 294% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.55 57.36
Recency 16 March 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 9534 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-11900F in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-11900F is a desktop processor while EPYC 9534 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-11900F and EPYC 9534, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F
AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 226 votes

Rate Core i9-11900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-11900F or EPYC 9534, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.