Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G vs Core i9-10980XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10980XE
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
21.22
+34.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.79

i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking232407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.1819.46
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Cezanne PRO (Zen 3)
Release date19 October 2019 (4 years ago)1 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$979no data
Current price$891 (0.9x MSRP)$638

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has 20% better value for money than i9-10980XE.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066AM4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10980XE 21.22
+34.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 15.79

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-10980XE 32822
+34.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 24430

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 34% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10980XE 1572
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1949
+24%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 24% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10980XE 12050
+47.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 8169

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 48% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i9-10980XE 7847
+22%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 6432

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 22% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i9-10980XE 59479
+56.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 37998

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 57% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i9-10980XE 2.81
+31.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 3.69

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 31% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i9-10980XE 38
+72.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 22

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 73% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-10980XE 3744
+91.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1956

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 91% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-10980XE 208
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 241
+15.9%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 16% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i9-10980XE 2.36
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 2.87
+21.6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 22% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-10980XE 18.2
+64%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 11.1

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 64% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-10980XE 7172
+2.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 7011

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 2% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-10980XE 158
+39.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 113

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 39% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-10980XE 215
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 250
+16%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 16% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.22 15.79
Recency 19 October 2019 1 June 2021
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i9-10980XE is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 541 vote

Rate Core i9-10980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 143 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10980XE or Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.