EPYC 9654 vs Core i9-10980XE

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i9-10980XE
2019
18 cores / 36 threads
21.25
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+272%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 272% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money12.4511.98
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Genoa
Release date19 October 2019 (4 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)$979$11,805
Current price$1258 (1.3x MSRP)$3975 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10980XE has 4% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Technical specs

Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)96
Threads36192
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)6 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)96 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2066SP5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size256 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10980XE 21.25
EPYC 9654 78.96
+272%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 272% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-10980XE 32861
EPYC 9654 122091
+272%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 272% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10980XE 1574
EPYC 9654 1829
+16.2%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 16% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10980XE 12044
EPYC 9654 18566
+54.2%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 54% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 21.25 78.96
Recency 19 October 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 18 96
Threads 36 192
Cost $979 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10980XE in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-10980XE is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 535 votes

Rate Core i9-10980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10980XE or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.