EPYC 9575F vs i9-10980XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking263not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.34no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency11.83no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Turin (2024)
Release date19 October 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$979$11,791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads36128
Base clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s DMI3 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2066SP5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 18 64
Threads 36 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 400 Watt

i9-10980XE has 142.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 255.6% more physical cores and 255.6% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-10980XE is a desktop processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10980XE and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 566 votes

Rate Core i9-10980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10980XE or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.