Core i5-13400E vs Core i9-10980XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking232not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.99no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Raptor Lake-S
Release date19 October 2019 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$979no data
Current price$891 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA20661700
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 730

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10980XE 1572
+18.6%
i5-13400E 1325

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Core i5-13400E by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10980XE 12048
+36.6%
i5-13400E 8823

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Core i5-13400E by 37% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 18 10
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10980XE and Core i5-13400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE
Intel Core i5-13400E
Core i5-13400E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 541 vote

Rate Core i9-10980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Core i5-13400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10980XE or Core i5-13400E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.