i7-8086K vs i9-10910

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10910
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
13.52
+50.7%
Core i7-8086K
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.97

Core i9-10910 outperforms Core i7-8086K by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking548851
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.005.40
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesComet LakeIntel Core i7
Power efficiency10.248.94
Architecture codenameComet Lake-S (2020)Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018)
Release date20 May 2020 (4 years ago)5 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10910 has 159% better value for money than i7-8086K.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data40
L1 cache640 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA12001151
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hz4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10910 13.52
+50.7%
i7-8086K 8.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10910 21483
+50.7%
i7-8086K 14255

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-10910 1749
+3.4%
i7-8086K 1692

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-10910 8468
+21.7%
i7-8086K 6959

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-10910 8131
+12.7%
i7-8086K 7216

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-10910 57842
+61.1%
i7-8086K 35896

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-10910 26
+70%
i7-8086K 15

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-10910 2302
+70.6%
i7-8086K 1349

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-10910 215
+4.4%
i7-8086K 206

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-10910 2.44
+7%
i7-8086K 2.28

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-10910 8613
+27.6%
i7-8086K 6752

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-10910 10244
+86.8%
i7-8086K 5485

Blender(-)

i9-10910 208
i7-8086K 316
+51.9%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-10910 1381
+11.4%
i7-8086K 1240

7-Zip Single

i9-10910 5690
+5%
i7-8086K 5417

7-Zip

i9-10910 60747
+68.5%
i7-8086K 36060

WebXPRT 3

i9-10910 236
+8.8%
i7-8086K 217

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.52 8.97
Recency 20 May 2020 5 June 2018
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

i9-10910 has a 50.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

i7-8086K, on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10910 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-8086K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10910 and Core i7-8086K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10910
Core i9-10910
Intel Core i7-8086K
Core i7-8086K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 64 votes

Rate Core i9-10910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 143 votes

Rate Core i7-8086K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10910 or Core i7-8086K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.