Xeon Bronze 3204 vs Core i9-10900X
Aggregated performance score
Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon Bronze 3204 by 365% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
Comparing Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 447 | 1509 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 16.52 | 8.04 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Bronze |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 19 October 2019 (4 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $213 |
| Current price | $537 | $277 (1.3x MSRP) |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i9-10900X has 105% better value for money than Xeon Bronze 3204.
Detailed Specifications
Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 19.25 MB (shared) | 8.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 94 °C | 77 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | - |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 94 GB/s | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon Bronze 3204 by 365% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon Bronze 3204 by 366% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon Bronze 3204 by 130% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon Bronze 3204 by 222% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 14.56 | 3.13 |
| Recency | 19 October 2019 | 2 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 20 | 6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 85 Watt |
The Core i9-10900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3204 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i9-10900X is a desktop processor while Xeon Bronze 3204 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900X and Xeon Bronze 3204, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
