Apple M1 vs Core i9-10900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900X
2019
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
14.54
+174%

i9-10900X outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900X and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4681113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)no data
Release date19 October 2019 (4 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$512 $3.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900X and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature94 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900X and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2066no data
Power consumption (TDP)165 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900X and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900X and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900X and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900X and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900X and Apple M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900X 14.54
+174%
Apple M1 5.31

Core i9-10900X outperforms Apple M1 by 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-10900X 22488
+174%
Apple M1 8207

Core i9-10900X outperforms Apple M1 by 174% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.54 5.31
Recency 19 October 2019 10 November 2020
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

The Core i9-10900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900X is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900X and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900X
Core i9-10900X
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 992 votes

Rate Core i9-10900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2109 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900X or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.