Xeon Silver 4114 vs i9-10900TE
Aggregate performance score
Core i9-10900TE outperforms Xeon Silver 4114 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1064 | 1138 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.87 | 1.22 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Silver |
| Power efficiency | 24.59 | 9.37 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (5 years ago) | 11 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $488 | $694 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i9-10900TE has 463% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4114.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10900TE and Xeon Silver 4114 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 640 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 10 MB |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 13.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 206 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 78 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900TE and Xeon Silver 4114 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 1200 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900TE and Xeon Silver 4114. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900TE and Xeon Silver 4114 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900TE and Xeon Silver 4114 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900TE and Xeon Silver 4114. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 115.212 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900TE and Xeon Silver 4114.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.01 | 7.41 |
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 11 July 2017 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 85 Watt |
i9-10900TE has a 8.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 142.9% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core i9-10900TE and Intel Xeon Silver 4114.
Note that Core i9-10900TE is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4114 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
