i7-8665UE vs i9-10900KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900KF
2020, $509
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
12.69
+358%
Core i7-8665UE
2018, $409
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
2.77

Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i7-8665UE by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7011938
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.520.78
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency4.287.79
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020−2025)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date30 April 2020 (5 years ago)1 October 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$509$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10900KF has 1377% better value for money than i7-8665UE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 620

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-10900KF 12.69
+358%
i7-8665UE 2.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-10900KF 22194
+357%
Samples: 1583
i7-8665UE 4852
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.69 2.77
Recency 30 April 2020 1 October 2018
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 8
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

i9-10900KF has a 358% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

i7-8665UE, on the other hand, has 733% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-10900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-8665UE in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900KF is a desktop processor while Core i7-8665UE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 353 votes

Rate Core i9-10900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-8665UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-10900KF and Core i7-8665UE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.