Apple M2 Max vs i9-10900KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900KF
2020, $509
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
12.69
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
15.34
+20.9%

M2 Max outperforms Core i9-10900KF by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking701539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency4.288.19
DesignerIntelApple
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020−2025)no data
Release date30 April 2020 (6 years ago)17 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$509no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)36 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-10900KF 12.69
Apple M2 Max 15.34
+20.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-10900KF 22193
Samples: 1604
Apple M2 Max 26859
+21%
Samples: 1008

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.69 15.34
Recency 30 April 2020 17 January 2023
Physical cores 10 12
Threads 20 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 79 Watt

i9-10900KF has 67% more threads.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 21% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 20% more physical cores, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 58% lower power consumption.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-10900KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900KF is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 353 votes

Rate Core i9-10900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 256 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-10900KF and M2 Max, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.