Xeon W-1350 vs i9-10900K

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900K
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
14.33
+19.7%
Xeon W-1350
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
11.97

Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon W-1350 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking500638
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.9994.74
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency10.8514.16
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$255

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1350 has 532% better value for money than i9-10900K.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size206 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900K 14.33
+19.7%
Xeon W-1350 11.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10900K 22764
+19.8%
Xeon W-1350 19007

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-10900K 1775
Xeon W-1350 2153
+21.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-10900K 9068
+11%
Xeon W-1350 8167

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.33 11.97
Integrated graphics card 3.09 4.56
Recency 30 April 2020 6 May 2021
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 80 Watt

i9-10900K has a 19.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

Xeon W-1350, on the other hand, has 47.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 56.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-1350 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900K is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900K and Xeon W-1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1231 vote

Rate Core i9-10900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900K or Xeon W-1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.