EPYC 4124P vs i9-10900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900K
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
14.88
+22.2%

Core i9-10900K outperforms EPYC 4124P by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking498655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.8651.93
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency10.8517.09
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4124P has 227% better value for money than i9-10900K.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size206 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900K 14.88
+22.2%
EPYC 4124P 12.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10900K 22768
+22.2%
EPYC 4124P 18637

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.88 12.18
Integrated graphics card 3.09 1.98
Recency 30 April 2020 21 May 2024
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

i9-10900K has a 22.2% higher aggregate performance score, 56.1% faster integrated GPU, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

EPYC 4124P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10900K is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4124P in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900K is a desktop processor while EPYC 4124P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900K and EPYC 4124P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
AMD EPYC 4124P
EPYC 4124P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1222 votes

Rate Core i9-10900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900K or EPYC 4124P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.