Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G vs i9-10900F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900F
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.54
+115%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.82

Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6201128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency18.25no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)no data
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHzno data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)4096 KB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900F 12.54
+115%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G 5.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-10900F 19920
+115%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G 9244

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.54 5.82
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

i9-10900F has a 115.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-10900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-10900F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 339 votes

Rate Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 80 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900F or Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.