Xeon 6325P vs i9-10900E
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 672 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 12.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 17.79 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $488 | $281 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 206 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900E and Xeon 6325P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 20 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
i9-10900E has 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.
Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i9-10900E and Intel Xeon 6325P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i9-10900E is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
