Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs i9-10900E
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX outperforms Core i9-10900E by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 750 | 71 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.53 | 26.83 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 7.20 | 4.81 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (5 years ago) | 23 July 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $488 | $1,649 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has 133% better value for money than i9-10900E.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10900E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 206 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 136 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.11 | 39.94 |
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 23 July 2025 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 16 |
| Threads | 20 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 350 Watt |
i9-10900E has 438.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, on the other hand, has a 259.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-10900E in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
