Ryzen AI 5 340 vs i9-10900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900E
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.14
Ryzen AI 5 340
2025
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
13.15
+8.3%

Ryzen AI 5 340 outperforms Core i9-10900E by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking711629
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.96no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency17.9145.04
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Krackan Point (2025)
Release date30 April 2020 (5 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size206 mm2no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1200FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon 840M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-10900E 12.14
Ryzen AI 5 340 13.15
+8.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-10900E 19469
Ryzen AI 5 340 21100
+8.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.14 13.15
Integrated graphics card 2.91 10.60
Recency 30 April 2020 6 January 2025
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

i9-10900E has 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

Ryzen AI 5 340, on the other hand, has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, 264.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core i9-10900E and AMD Ryzen AI 5 340.

Note that Core i9-10900E is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 5 340 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900E
Core i9-10900E
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
Ryzen AI 5 340

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Core i9-10900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 5 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-10900E and Ryzen AI 5 340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.