Ryzen 5 7535HS vs i9-10900E
Aggregate performance score
Core i9-10900E outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 624 | 668 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 24 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 12.51 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 17.85 | 31.31 |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Rembrandt-R (2023) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $488 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 4.55 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 206 mm2 | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.26 | 11.58 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 16.29 |
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
i9-10900E has a 5.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.
Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has 427.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS.
Note that Core i9-10900E is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
