i3-3225 vs i9-10900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900E
2020, $488
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
10.88
+737%

Core i9-10900E outperforms Core i3-3225 by a whopping 737% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8552513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.690.09
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.061.00
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020−2025)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date30 April 2020 (5 years ago)3 September 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$264

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10900E has 10667% better value for money than i3-3225.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads204
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size206 mm2118 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1200FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-10900E 10.88
+737%
i3-3225 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-10900E 18785
+724%
Samples: 16
i3-3225 2280
Samples: 556

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-10900E 1454
+171%
i3-3225 537

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-10900E 7700
+580%
i3-3225 1132

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.88 1.30
Integrated graphics card 2.85 1.09
Recency 30 April 2020 3 September 2012
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

i9-10900E has a 737% higher aggregate performance score, 161% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

i3-3225, on the other hand, has 18% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-10900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-3225 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 12 votes

Rate Core i9-10900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 250 votes

Rate Core i3-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-10900E and Core i3-3225, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.