Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs i9-10880H
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 9950X3D outperforms Core i9-10880H by a whopping 389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 9 9950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 906 | 55 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 64.19 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Comet Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.79 | 24.34 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 2 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 9 9950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 9 9950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1440 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 9 9950X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.88 | 43.45 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.67 | 1.71 |
| Recency | 2 April 2020 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 170 Watt |
i9-10880H has 56.1% faster integrated GPU, and 277.8% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D, on the other hand, has a 389.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-10880H in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i9-10880H is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
