PRO A10-9700E vs i9-10880H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 2 Watt
8.06
+366%

Core i9-10880H outperforms PRO A10-9700E by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10562238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Comet Lakeno data
Power efficiencyno data5.31
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 April 2020 (5 years ago)3 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2048 KB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA1440AM4
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB + 16 MB35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i9-10880H 8.06
+366%
PRO A10-9700E 1.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i9-10880H 14240
+366%
Samples: 19
PRO A10-9700E 3059
Samples: 81

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.06 1.73
Recency 2 April 2020 3 October 2016
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 35 Watt

i9-10880H has a 365.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1650% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-10880H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD PRO A10-9700E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-10880H is a notebook processor while PRO A10-9700E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H
AMD PRO A10-9700E
PRO A10-9700E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 61 votes

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 16 votes

Rate PRO A10-9700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-10880H and PRO A10-9700E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.