Core i9-10880H vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.46
+376%
Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
9.56

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Core i9-10880H by 376% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Core i9-10880H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking39729
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.00no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Comet Lake
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years old)2 April 2020 (4 years old)
Current price$6796 no data

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.46
+376%
i9-10880H 9.56

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Core i9-10880H by 376% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+376%
i9-10880H 14642

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Core i9-10880H by 376% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.46 9.56
Recency 18 September 2019 2 April 2020
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 45 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10880H in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10880H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Core i9-10880H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 vote

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.