Xeon W-3245 vs i9-10800F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.11
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data3.64
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020−2025)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date30 April 2020 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1200FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 April 2020 3 June 2019
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

i9-10800F has an age advantage of 10 months, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3245, on the other hand, has 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core i9-10800F and Intel Xeon W-3245. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-10800F is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3245 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10800F
Core i9-10800F
Intel Xeon W-3245
Xeon W-3245

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 12 votes

Rate Core i9-10800F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Xeon W-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i9-10800F and Xeon W-3245, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.