Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i9-10800F
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 316 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 84 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 41.81 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Vermeer (Zen 3) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 8 October 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $449 |
| Current price | no data | $321 (0.7x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 8 October 2020 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 8 |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 7 5800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
