Atom x7405C vs i7-990X Extreme Edition
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | no data |
| Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 13 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $57 |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 26 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 February 2011 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 12 Watt |
i7-990X Extreme Edition has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Atom x7405C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-990X Extreme Edition is a desktop processor while Atom x7405C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-990X Extreme Edition and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
