Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Core i7-990X EE
Aggregated performance score
Core i7-990X EE outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 168% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1268 | 1978 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | no data | 1.43 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core i7 (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | no data | August 2008 (15 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $75 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Technical specs
Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.467 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.73 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus support | 6400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 6 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 820 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA-1366 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-990X EE outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 168% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-990X EE outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 168% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 4.28 | 1.60 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
The Core i7-990X EE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9650 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-990X EE and Core 2 Quad Q9650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
