FX-4320 vs Core i7-980X EE
Aggregated performance score
Core i7-980X EE outperforms FX-4320 by 97% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1346 | 1815 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.79 | 4.00 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core i7 (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | no data | 23 October 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Current price | $1108 | $53 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
FX-4320 has 123% better value for money than i7-980X EE.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.333 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus support | 6400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4096 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA-1366 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1866 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320.
| PCIe version | no data | Not Listed |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-980X EE outperforms FX-4320 by 97% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-980X EE outperforms FX-4320 by 97% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.94 | 2.00 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
The Core i7-980X EE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-980X EE and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
