A6-9400 vs i7-9800X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9800X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 165 Watt
11.39
+566%
A6-9400
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.71

Core i7-9800X outperforms A6-9400 by a whopping 566% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9800X and A6-9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6852040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.29no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency6.532.49
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)16 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9800X and A6-9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160K
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9800X and A6-9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066AM4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9800X and A6-9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-9800X and A6-9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9800X and A6-9400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9800X and A6-9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/ARadeon R5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9800X and A6-9400.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9800X 11.39
+566%
A6-9400 1.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9800X 18090
+566%
A6-9400 2717

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.39 1.71
Recency 19 October 2018 16 March 2019
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

i7-9800X has a 566.1% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-9800X is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9800X and A6-9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9800X
Core i7-9800X
AMD A6-9400
A6-9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 81 vote

Rate Core i7-9800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 26 votes

Rate A6-9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9800X or A6-9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.