FX-6350 vs i7-980

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-980
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.37
+51.2%
FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.89

Core i7-980 outperforms FX-6350 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-980 and FX-6350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13491660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.182.19
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date26 June 2011 (13 years ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,109no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-980 and FX-6350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads126
Base clock speed3.33 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate4.8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C61 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-980 and FX-6350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-980 and FX-6350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core i7-980 and FX-6350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-980 and FX-6350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-980 and FX-6350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-980 and FX-6350.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-980 4.37
+51.2%
FX-6350 2.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-980 6936
+51.1%
FX-6350 4589

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

i7-980 7930
+40.9%
FX-6350 5630

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.37 2.89
Recency 26 June 2011 29 April 2013
Threads 12 6
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 125 Watt

i7-980 has a 51.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

FX-6350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-980 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-980 and FX-6350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-980
Core i7-980
AMD FX-6350
FX-6350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 45 votes

Rate Core i7-980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 373 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-980 or FX-6350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.