EPYC 7573X vs i7-9750HF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9750HF
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
6.82
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.54
+553%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Core i7-9750HF by a whopping 553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking102848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency14.0814.77
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-HR (2019)Milan-X (2022)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size149 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9750HF 6.82
EPYC 7573X 44.54
+553%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9750HF 10625
EPYC 7573X 69432
+553%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.82 44.54
Recency 23 April 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 280 Watt

i7-9750HF has 522.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has a 553.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9750HF in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-9750HF is a notebook processor while EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9750HF and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9750HF
Core i7-9750HF
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 64 votes

Rate Core i7-9750HF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9750HF or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.