i5-9300HF vs i7-9750HF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9750HF
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
6.68
+44.9%
Core i5-9300HF
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.61

Core i7-9750HF outperforms Core i5-9300HF by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10391299
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency14.069.70
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-HR (2019)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)30 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$250

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s DMI
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/s41.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9750HF 6.68
+44.9%
i5-9300HF 4.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9750HF 10610
+44.9%
i5-9300HF 7322

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-9750HF 1367
+6.2%
i5-9300HF 1287

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-9750HF 4851
+32.6%
i5-9300HF 3657

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.68 4.61
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8

i7-9750HF has a 44.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Core i7-9750HF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9300HF in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9750HF and Core i5-9300HF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9750HF
Core i7-9750HF
Intel Core i5-9300HF
Core i5-9300HF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 64 votes

Rate Core i7-9750HF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 272 votes

Rate Core i5-9300HF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9750HF or Core i5-9300HF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.