Xeon Gold 6348 vs i7-975

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-975
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.20
Xeon Gold 6348
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 235 Watt
32.64
+1384%

Xeon Gold 6348 outperforms Core i7-975 by a whopping 1384% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1848123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.6013.15
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$476no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads856
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)42 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)68 °C80 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt235 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size24 GB6 TB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-975 2.20
Xeon Gold 6348 32.64
+1384%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-975 3493
Xeon Gold 6348 51843
+1384%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.20 32.64
Recency 2 June 2009 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 8 56
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 235 Watt

i7-975 has 80.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6348, on the other hand, has a 1383.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6348 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-975 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-975 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6348 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-975 and Xeon Gold 6348, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-975
Core i7-975
Intel Xeon Gold 6348
Xeon Gold 6348

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 26 votes

Rate Core i7-975 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6348 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-975 or Xeon Gold 6348, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.