Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i7-9700T
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms i7-9700T by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 949 | 711 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.84 | 8.52 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 2 March 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $323 | $399 |
| Current price | $290 (0.9x MSRP) | $252 (0.6x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-9700T has 15% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700X.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 16384 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 180.3 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | FMA3 |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
| XFR | no data | + |
| SenseMI | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | - |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | - |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | - |
| Clear Video HD | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.2 GHz | - |
| InTru 3D | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | - |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304@24Hz | - |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | - |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | - |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i7-9700T by 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i7-9700T by 45% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-9700T outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 27% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i7-9700T by 8% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.97 | 10.13 |
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 2 March 2017 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Cost | $323 | $399 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
The Ryzen 7 1700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700T in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 7 1700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
