EPYC 7473X vs i7-9700KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700KF
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
9.01
EPYC 7473X
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
37.46
+316%

EPYC 7473X outperforms Core i7-9700KF by a whopping 316% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking85285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency8.9414.71
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Milan-X (2022)
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$374no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700KF 9.01
EPYC 7473X 37.46
+316%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700KF 14254
EPYC 7473X 59280
+316%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 37.46
Recency 7 January 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 240 Watt

i7-9700KF has 152.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has a 315.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7473X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700KF in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700KF is a desktop processor while EPYC 7473X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700KF and EPYC 7473X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700KF
Core i7-9700KF
AMD EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 423 votes

Rate Core i7-9700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7473X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700KF or EPYC 7473X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.