i5-13490F vs i7-9700KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700KF
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
9.32
Core i5-13490F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
18.01
+93.2%

Core i5-13490F outperforms Core i7-9700KF by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking846358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.0454.24
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency8.9525.27
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$374$235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13490F has 575% better value for money than i7-9700KF.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data215 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA11511700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700KF 9.32
i5-13490F 18.01
+93.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700KF 14259
i5-13490F 27559
+93.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.32 18.01
Recency 7 January 2019 10 February 2023
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

i5-13490F has a 93.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 25% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13490F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700KF in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700KF and Core i5-13490F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700KF
Core i7-9700KF
Intel Core i5-13490F
Core i5-13490F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 421 vote

Rate Core i7-9700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 160 votes

Rate Core i5-13490F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700KF or Core i5-13490F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.