Apple M2 Max vs i7-9700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700F
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.34
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.80
+101%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Core i7-9700F by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking913393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Apple M-Series
Power efficiency12.1520.14
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)no data
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$323no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)36 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-

Security technologies

Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700F 8.34
Apple M2 Max 16.80
+101%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700F 13250
Apple M2 Max 26692
+101%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.34 16.80
Recency 23 April 2019 17 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 79 Watt

i7-9700F has 21.5% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 101.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700F in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700F is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700F and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 684 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 235 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700F or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.