Xeon 6325P vs i7-9700E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700E
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
7.87
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+26.6%

Xeon 6325P outperforms Core i7-9700E by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1065878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency11.6817.47
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size180.3 mm2163 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket11511700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-9700E 7.87
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+26.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i7-9700E 12652
Xeon 6325P 16013
+26.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.87 9.96
Recency 23 April 2019 24 February 2025
Physical cores 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

i7-9700E has 100% more physical cores.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has a 26.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-9700E in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700E is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700E
Core i7-9700E
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-9700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-9700E and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.