Ultra 5 236V vs i7-9700E
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 236V outperforms Core i7-9700E by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 953 | 557 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 11.55 | 75.10 |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
Release date | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | 180.3 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 1151 | Intel BGA 2833 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Arc 130V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 7.93 | 13.49 |
Recency | 23 April 2019 | 24 September 2024 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ultra 5 236V has a 70.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 5 236V is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700E in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-9700E is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 236V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700E and Core Ultra 5 236V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.