Xeon X5450 vs i7-970

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-970
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.12
+173%

Core i7-970 outperforms Xeon X5450 by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13892135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.001.19
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)no data
Release date19 July 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$662no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads12no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHzno data
Bus rate4.8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C63 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-+
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-970 4.12
+173%
Xeon X5450 1.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-970 6546
+172%
Xeon X5450 2404

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-970 495
+30.3%
Xeon X5450 380

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-970 2278
+107%
Xeon X5450 1101

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.12 1.51
Recency 19 July 2010 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 120 Watt

i7-970 has a 172.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X5450, on the other hand, has 8.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-970 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5450 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-970 is a desktop processor while Xeon X5450 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-970 and Xeon X5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-970
Core i7-970
Intel Xeon X5450
Xeon X5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 68 votes

Rate Core i7-970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 320 votes

Rate Xeon X5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-970 or Xeon X5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.