Xeon E5-2407 v2 vs i7-965
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-965 outperforms Xeon E5-2407 v2 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2184 | 2192 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 0.12 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.63 | 1.01 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) |
| Release date | November 2008 (17 years ago) | 1 September 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,509 | $476 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E5-2407 v2 has 200% better value for money than i7-965.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i7-965 and Xeon E5-2407 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 10 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 160 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 76 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-965 and Xeon E5-2407 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | FCLGA1356 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E5-2407 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | + |
| PAE | 36 Bit | 46 Bit |
Security technologies
Core i7-965 and Xeon E5-2407 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E5-2407 v2 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E5-2407 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | 384 GB |
| Max memory channels | 3 | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E5-2407 v2.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.93 | 1.92 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
i7-965 has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.
Xeon E5-2407 v2, on the other hand, has a 105% more advanced lithography process, and 63% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core i7-965 and Intel Xeon E5-2407 v2.
Note that Core i7-965 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2407 v2 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
