Xeon E-2468 vs i7-965

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-965
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.16
Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.92
+683%

Xeon E-2468 outperforms Core i7-965 by a whopping 683% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1863388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.4596.15
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.5724.62
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,509$426

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2468 has 3824% better value for money than i7-965.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size263 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size24 GB128 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-965 2.16
Xeon E-2468 16.92
+683%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-965 3424
Xeon E-2468 26870
+685%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 16.92
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2468 has a 683.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2468 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-965 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-965 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2468 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-965 and Xeon E-2468, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-965
Core i7-965
Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 24 votes

Rate Core i7-965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-965 or Xeon E-2468, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.