Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i7-965
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-965 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8800 by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2184 | 3139 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | November 2008 (17 years ago) | 1 April 2009 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,509 | $241 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-965 has 100% better value for money than Core 2 Duo P8800.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core i7-965 and Core 2 Duo P8800: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.25V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-965 and Core 2 Duo P8800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | BGA479,PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 and Core 2 Duo P8800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-965 and Core 2 Duo P8800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-965 and Core 2 Duo P8800 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 and Core 2 Duo P8800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.93 | 0.54 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 25 Watt |
i7-965 has a 257% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Core 2 Duo P8800, on the other hand, has 420% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-965 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-965 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo P8800 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
