Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs i7-965 Extreme Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7EEAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiencyno data10.46
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameNehalem (2008−2010)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Release date17 November 2008 (17 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size263 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors731 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataFP7/FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataAES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size24 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2008 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 210 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 364% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-965 Extreme Edition is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate Core i7-965 Extreme Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and Ryzen 3 PRO 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.